Jeep Commander 2006 vs Saab 9-7X 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Commander) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Saab 9-7X) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 72 HP less power than Saab 9-7X, but torque is 137 NM more than Saab 9-7X. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 13.5 | |
|
The Jeep Commander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Saab 9-7X, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Commander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Saab 9-7X, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 1127 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
|
Saab 9-7X has more luggage space. Jeep Commander has 915 litres less trunk space than the Saab 9-7X. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Saab 9-7X has
| |