Jeep Commander 2006 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 28 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Commander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Commander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Commander is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 339 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |