Jeep Commander 2006 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Commander engine produces 6 HP less power than Mercedes ML, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Commander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Commander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine Mercedes ML 2008 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Commander is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 339 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |