Jeep Commander 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Commander consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Commander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Jeep Commander and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |