Jeep Commander 2006 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Commander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Commander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |