Jeep Commander 2006 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 6 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 15.0 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
|
Land Rover Discovery 2004: All wheels are powered permanently, has a center differential. Full time 4WD can be used both on and off road. Transfer cases in most have two modes (low and high), which allows the use of low speed range in harsh conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 170 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`812 | 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |