Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 170 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 443 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`905 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |