Jeep Commander 2006 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 8 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 74 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 708 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`905 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |