Jeep Commander 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 376 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 30 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 138 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Toyota 4-Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`905 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |