Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Commander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.7 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 326 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 510 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 15.5 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Jeep Commander petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Jeep Commander equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Jeep Commander has 37 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`186 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |