Jeep Commander 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.7 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 326 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 510 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 15.5 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Jeep Commander petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Jeep Commander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 766 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`186 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |