Jeep Commander 2006 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Commander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.7 | 2.8 - 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 326 HP | 177 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 510 NM | 314 - 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | 10.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 15.5 | 8.6 - 11.7 | |
|
Jeep Commander petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Jeep Commander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 666 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`186 | ~ 2`527 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |