Jeep Commander 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Commander
2006 - 2010
Toyota Land Cruiser
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Jeep Commander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jeep Commander is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.0 - 5.74.0 - 5.7

Performance

Power: 213 - 326 HP235 - 381 HP
Torque: 319 - 510 NM376 - 615 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 9.5 seconds8.6 - 9.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.8 - 15.510.0 - 15.6
Jeep Commander petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Jeep Commander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.95 m
Width: 1.90 m1.97 m
Height: 1.84 m1.95 m
Jeep Commander is smaller.
Jeep Commander is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 212 litres701 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1950 litresno data
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space.
Jeep Commander has 489 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`186~ 3`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 920021 200
Pros and Cons: Jeep Commander has
  • automatic transmission only
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv