Jeep Commander 2006 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Commander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Patriot has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Patriot can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.7 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 326 HP | 140 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 510 NM | 223 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | 10.7 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 15.5 | 6.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Jeep Commander petrol engines consumes on average 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Patriot. On average, Jeep Commander equipped with diesel engines consume 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Patriot. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 38 cm longer than the Jeep Patriot, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1777 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 440 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`186 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |