Jaguar X-Type 2001 vs Mazda 6 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 84 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type has 4x4: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar S-Type | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2005 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar X-Type is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 501 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |