Jaguar X-Type 2001 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 86 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type has 4x4: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar S-Type | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar X-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is smaller. Jaguar X-Type is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 48 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |