Jaguar X-Type 2001 vs BMW 5 series 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 24 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 6 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar S-Type | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is smaller. Jaguar X-Type is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 68 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |