Jaguar X-Type 2002 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 157 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 7 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Rover 75 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | 432 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar X-Type has 20 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar X-Type (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Rover 75 has
| |