Jaguar X-Type 2002 vs BMW 5 series 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 157 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is smaller. Jaguar X-Type is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 68 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |