Jaguar X-Type 2002 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 157 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 2 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Accord might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 459 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 7 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Accord has
| |