Jaguar X-Type 2008 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 266 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Jaguar X-Type engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 154 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 43 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 1003 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |