Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Volvo XC70 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 21 HP more power than Volvo XC70, but torque is 36 NM less than Volvo XC70. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.1 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar S-Type | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is smaller. Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |