Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type has 4x4: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar S-Type | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar X-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford Mondeo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2005 2.5 engine: The LCBD engine features a multi-point fuel injection system, where each cylinder is equipped with its own injector for precise fuel delivery. This system is highly durable and reliable, with a low likelihood of ... More about Ford Mondeo 2005 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is smaller, but slightly higher. Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 95 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |