Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Volvo V70 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |