Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Subaru Outback 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 35 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 104 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |