Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Mazda 6 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jaguar X-Type) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 6) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 36 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 123 NM more than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2005 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 1712 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |