Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Jaguar X-Type) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Cougar) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type and Ford Cougar have the same engine power, but Jaguar X-Type torque is 154 NM more than Ford Cougar. Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.32 m | |
Jaguar X-Type is larger. Jaguar X-Type is 2 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 930 litres | |
Jaguar X-Type has 15 litres more trunk space than the Ford Cougar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar X-Type (by 485 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Cougar. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |