Jaguar X-Type 2008 vs Citroen C5 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 51 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar X-Type consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type has 4x4: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar S-Type | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 563 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1415 litres | 1658 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 111 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 2`027 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`427 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 600 kg | |
| Jaguar X-Type load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Citroen C5. Therefore, Citroen C5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |