Jaguar X-Type 2008 vs Mazda 6 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 18 HP less power than Mazda 6, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar X-Type could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar X-Type and Mazda 6 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1415 litres | 1751 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 336 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |