Jaguar X-Type 2001 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 231 HP | 90 - 280 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 360 NM | 178 - 363 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10.8 seconds | 8.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.5 | 7.0 - 11.8 | |
Jaguar X-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. On average, Jaguar X-Type equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Jaguar X-Type is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar X-Type is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | 1400 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 18 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 948 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`060 | ~ 1`851 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 5.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |