Jaguar X-Type 2008 vs Volvo XC60 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar X-Type
2008 - 2010
Volvo XC60
2008 - 2013
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 3.02.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 145 - 231 HP163 - 285 HP
Torque: 244 - 284 NM300 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 9.1 seconds7.5 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 10.56.0 - 11.9
Jaguar X-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jaguar X-Type equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.63 m
Width: 1.79 m1.89 m
Height: 1.39 m1.71 m
Jaguar X-Type is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 32 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 452 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
452 litres1455 litres
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Jaguar X-Type has 43 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Jaguar X-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 1003 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`096~ 2`499
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 40009000
Pros and Cons: Jaguar X-Type has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv