Jaguar X-Type 2004 vs Volvo XC70 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar X-Type
2004 - 2008
Volvo XC70
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jaguar X-Type is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar X-Type also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.4 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 130 - 231 HP163 - 210 HP
Torque: 200 - 360 NM320 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 11.1 seconds8.1 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8 - 10.67.6 - 11.1
Jaguar X-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Jaguar X-Type equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.73 m
Width: 1.79 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.56 m
Jaguar X-Type is smaller.
Jaguar X-Type is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 452 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1415 litres1641 litres
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space.
Jaguar X-Type has 33 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 226 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`050~ 2`220
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 28004200
Pros and Cons: Jaguar X-Type has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo XC70 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv