Jaguar XKR 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 363 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 505 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XKR is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XKR engine produces 216 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Jaguar XKR reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 9.3 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XKR consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XKR could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Jaguar XKR is larger, but lower. Jaguar XKR is 15 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XKR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XKR has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |