Jaguar XKR 2006 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 420 HP | 212 HP | |
Torque: | 560 NM | 325 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7 seconds | |
Jaguar XKR is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XKR engine produces 208 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 235 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Jaguar XKR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.4 | |
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XKR consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XKR could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.39 m | |
Jaguar XKR is larger, but lower. Jaguar XKR is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 20 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XKR is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 350 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XKR has 50 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XKR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 200 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XKR has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |