Jaguar XKR 2004 vs Dodge Charger 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XKR
2004 - 2006
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jaguar XKR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 4.22.7 - 6.1

Performance

Power: 395 HP193 - 432 HP
Torque: 540 NM258 - 569 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds4.9 - 6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.49.8 - 14.7
Jaguar XKR petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m5.08 m
Width: 2.02 m1.89 m
Height: 1.30 m1.48 m
Jaguar XKR is 31 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XKR is 18 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 327 litres460 litres
Dodge Charger has more luggage space.
Jaguar XKR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger.
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`105~ 2`185
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6800
Pros and Cons:
    Dodge Charger has
    • available with 4x4 drive
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv