Jaguar XKR 2004 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Jaguar XKR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.2 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 395 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
Torque: | 540 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
Jaguar XKR petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.48 m | |
Jaguar XKR is 31 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XKR is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 460 litres | |
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Jaguar XKR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`185 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |