Jaguar XK 2011 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 550 HP | 421 HP | |
| Torque: | 680 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XK is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XK engine produces 129 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 12.0 | |
| Jaguar XK consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XK could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 78 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | 1`732 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |