Jaguar XK 2002 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 553 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XK is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XK engine produces 188 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 228 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.4 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XK consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XK could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`104 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |