Jaguar XK 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2003

 
Jaguar XK
2002 - 2006
BMW 3 series
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.2 Petrol2.0 Diesel
Petrol engines (Jaguar XK) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 3 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 400 HP150 HP
Torque: 553 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds8.8 seconds
Jaguar XK is more dynamic to drive.
Jaguar XK engine produces 250 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 223 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.45.7
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jaguar XK consumes 6.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XK could require 1005 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1400 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.49 m
Width: 1.83 m1.76 m
Height: 1.30 m1.37 m
Jaguar XK is larger, but lower.
Jaguar XK is 29 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 327 litres410 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 83 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Jaguar XK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1041`915
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 13 0005000
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv