Jaguar XK 2002 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 553 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XK is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XK engine produces 250 HP more power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 372 NM more than Alfa Romeo GTV. Thanks to more power Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.2 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo GTV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XK consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XK could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Jaguar XK is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XK is 50 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 110 litres | |
|
Jaguar XK has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XK has 217 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`104 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |