Jaguar XK 2002 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XK engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 13.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XK consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Jaguar XK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |