Jaguar XK 2006 vs BMW 6 series 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 490 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XK engine produces 67 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 70 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XK consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XK could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XK consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 3 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 450 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Jaguar XK has 120 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Jaguar XK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`035 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`645 kg | 1`645 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 390 kg | 445 kg | |
| Jaguar XK load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than BMW 6 series. Therefore, BMW 6 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |