Jaguar XK 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XK engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Ford Mustang. Despite less power, Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 13.9 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XK consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Jaguar XK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Jaguar XK is larger, but lower. Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 68 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |