Jaguar XK 2011 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 HP | 421 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XK engine produces 36 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XK consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Jaguar XK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 78 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 1`732 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |