Jaguar XK 2002 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XK is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.2 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 - 400 HP | 212 - 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 - 553 NM | 325 - 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 6.4 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 12.4 | 10.4 - 13.0 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |