Jaguar XK 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XK is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 - 400 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 - 553 NM | 200 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 6.4 seconds | 6.5 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 12.4 | 5.7 - 9.6 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Jaguar XK is larger, but lower. Jaguar XK is 29 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 410 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 83 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Jaguar XK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |