Jaguar XK 2011 vs Ford Mustang 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XK is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 - 550 HP | 317 - 421 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 - 680 NM | 432 - 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.5 seconds | 4.8 - 5.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.3 | 8.0 - 13.5 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XK is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 78 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`122 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |