Jaguar XJS 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1988
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 284 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 415 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJS engine produces 115 HP more power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 191 NM more than Nissan 200 SX. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 9.1 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJS consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJS could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Jaguar XJS is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJS is 29 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJS is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJS has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJS has 87 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`175 kg | 1`675 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJS has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |