Jaguar XJS 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJS is available only with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 6.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 226 - 318 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 471 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 8.2 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 14.9 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Jaguar XJS petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Jaguar XJS is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJS is 40 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJS is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJS has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJS has 87 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJS is 2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Jaguar XJS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`139 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJS has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |