Jaguar XJR 2017 vs Lexus GS 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Jaguar XJR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Lexus GS can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 5.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 575 HP | 181 - 477 HP | |
Torque: | 700 NM | 221 - 530 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | 4.6 - 9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 4.4 - 12.3 | |
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus GS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.13 m | 4.88 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Jaguar XJR is larger. Jaguar XJR is 25 cm longer than the Lexus GS, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 458 litres | |
Jaguar XJR has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJR has 62 litres more trunk space than the Lexus GS. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJR is 0.8 metres more than that of the Lexus GS, which means Jaguar XJR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 2`259 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJR has
|
Lexus GS has
| |