Jaguar XJR 2017 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJR is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 575 HP | 184 - 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 233 - 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 8.1 - 10.7 | |
|
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Jaguar XJR is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJR is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJR has 12 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. This could mean that the Jaguar XJR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |